Underground solutions for aboveground climate challenges: leveraging subterranean microbial processes for GHG removal

$105,704
Goal
Draft
  • $0
    pledged
  • 0%
    funded
  • Private
    Not Launched

About This Project

Caves are known to function as massive sink of atmospheric methane. However, the potential for artificial mines to serve a similar role, remains unknown. With engineered interventions, mines are a promising target for greenhouse gas (GHG) removal. This project will determine the biogeochemical basis, to enhance microbial GHG uptake in mines. This will be achieved through integrating environmental sampling with gas flux measurement, physicochemical profiling, and advance omics

Ask the Scientists

Join The Discussion

Motivating Factor

The rapid rise in methane (CH4) is a leading cause of global warming, yet strategies to directly remove this gas from air are limited. CH4 oxidizing bacteria, are the sole biological mediator of this process, but their abundance and activities in most environments are low. Caves are a notable exception where these bacteria are consistently abundant and active1–4. Recent estimates show that the atmospheric CH4 sink in limestone caves, is comparable to that in surface soils5. Cave microbes also remove other climate-active gases such as H2 and CO and convert CO2 into biomass4. We propose that artificial mines, can be enhanced to function as natural bioreactors to simultaneously remove multiple GHGs, e.g. via ventilation and atmospheric draw-down. This approach differs from other ecosystem engineering solutions, in that it leaves the aboveground landscape undisturbed. A key priority of this solution is to understand what factors limit or promote GHG uptake by underground communities.

Specific Bottleneck

While microbial atmospheric CH4 uptake has been documented in cave ecosystems, data on the ability and activity of microbial communities in processing other climate-active gases (e.g. H2, CO, CO2) is lacking, hindering gross estimation of net underground GHG removal potential6. The conditions that promote or constrain this climate-relevant process are also minimally explored, which is a crucial prerequisite for designing strategies to enhance underground GHG sink. Early data suggest air exchange between underground atmosphere and land surface7 and seasonal humidity variation3 may be limiting methanotrophs and net CH4 removal, representing an area for intervention. However, these insights require systematic evaluation. It also remains unknown if high microbial GHG uptake ability and activities occur in artificial mines, in which these manmade underground structures may serve as the prime target for repurposing as natural bioreactors for GHG removal

Actionable Goals

Systematic and interdisciplinary surveys to profile physiochemistry, GHG uptake/production activities, and microbial communities across natural caves and mines should be performed to quantify potentials of the underground GHG sink, integrating the following:

1. Field monitoring of CH4, CO2, H2, CO, and N2O fluxes across seasons.

2. Profiling of cave/mine physicochemical conditions, including wind speed (ventilation rate), air humidity, temperatures, rock geology, and weather history.

3. Measuring the activities of sediment/rock/surface biofilm microbial communities to consume GHG at various temperature and moisture conditions.

4. Metagenomic and metatranscriptomic investigation of active microbial mediators of GHG uptake.

5. Upscaling modelling to estimate the overall GHG removal capacity.

These data should be integrated to evaluate optimal conditions that promote microbial GHG removal and inform feasible enhancement strategies for testing.

Budget

Please wait...

Budget items are detailed in Solution Statement.

Meet the Team

Pok Man (Bob) Leung
Pok Man (Bob) Leung
ARC DECRA Fellow

Affiliates

Department of Microbiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University
View Profile
Sean Bay
Sean Bay
Dr

Affiliates

La Trobe University
View Profile

Team Bio

Our team is experienced in the study of microbial mediated biogeochemical processes across diverse ecosystems (from deserts, forests, to caves) through integrating techniques across disciplines including microbial ecology, metabolism, modelling, and biogeochemistry. We have recently provided the first evidence that trace gas oxidation is a dominant process supporting microbial growth in underground ecosystems and represents an overlooked sink of GHG.

Pok Man (Bob) Leung

ARC DECRA Fellow | Microbial ecologist | Early career researcher investigating microbial metabolism of climate-active gases and microbial survival across environments

Sean Bay

Dr. Bay is an environmental microbiologist, lecturer and ARC DECRA fellow. He heads The Bay Group at La Trobe University, Melbourne. Dr. Bay's pioneering research focuses on how soil bacteria utilize atmospheric trace gases such as hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and methane to survive in energy-limited ecosystems, including deserts, glaciers, and caves. He earned his PhD from Monash University in 2020, investigating soil microbial diversity under the mentorship of Professor Chris Greening. Dr. Bay gained post-doctoral experience with a position at Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future (SAEF). Since early 2023, Dr. Bay has taken a position as lecturer and independent research fellow, established his research group. His research is widely published in leading journals and backed by competitive grants.

Additional Information

References

1. Fernandez-Cortes, A. et al. Subterranean atmospheres may act as daily methane sinks. Nature Communications 6, 7003 (2015).

2. Lennon, J. T. et al. Microbial contributions to subterranean methane sinks. Geobiology 15, 254–258 (2017).

3. Nguyễn-Thuỳ, D. et al. Subterranean microbial oxidation of atmospheric methane in cavernous tropical karst. Chemical Geology 466, 229–238 (2017).

4. Bay, S. K. et al. Microbial aerotrophy enables continuous primary production in diverse cave ecosystems. bioRxiv (2024) doi:10.1101/2024.05.30.596735.

5. Zeng, G. et al. Methane sink of subterranean space in an integrated atmosphere-soil-cave system. Environmental Research 252, 118904 (2024).

6. Nayeli Luis-Vargas, M., Webb, J., White, S. & Bay, S. K. Linking surface and subsurface: the biogeochemical basis of cave microbial ecosystem services. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment 3, e70031 (2024).

7. Waring, C. L. et al. Seasonal total methane depletion in limestone caves. Scientific Reports 7, 8314 (2017).


Project Backers

  • 0Backers
  • 0%Funded
  • $0Total Donations
  • $0Average Donation
Please wait...