Jason R. Finley

Jason R. Finley

Feb 27, 2014

Group 6 Copy 173
4

4 comments

Join the conversation!Sign In
  • Andrew Haun
    Andrew HaunBacker
    I think "can we", rather than "will we", is the question for current research. "Will we go back" is really asking whether or not we will find ourselves in social situations where we aren't using cameras and recorded imagery to supplement or stand in place of our perception and memory - certainly all of us will find ourselves in low-tech situations, some more often than others. "Can we go back" is the question of how the technology is altering our capacities, so that when we *do* find ourselves in low-tech situations, we are effectively maladapted. So, to my mind (having studied visual adaptation in several contexts), the research question is really about adaptation - how do memory functions adapt to lower demand availed by technology, and how does this adaptation interact with low-tech situations?
    Feb 27, 2014
  • Michael jennings
    Michael jenningsBacker
    either way though you're still reconstructing the memory for yourself and interpreting the events. The research of Elizabeth Loftus shows how reliable (or unreliable) memory actually is. Until technology recahes the point where it can actually capture and store actual neural thoughts and memories, it will still be just an aid to recollection at best. But when recording an event becomes the primary experience of the user, rather than a corollary, then technology itself has altered the formation of the memory. An interesting question nonetheless!
    Feb 27, 2014
  • David G Pavlick
    David G PavlickBacker
    My hope would be that, rather than going back, we go forward; that we use automated, objective, external storage to counteract the natural degradation of memory. When you have a record not influenced or obfuscated by your emotion, logical fallacies, or cognitive errors, the door to objective reflection and evaluation swings a little further open.
    Feb 27, 2014
  • Jason R. Finley
    Jason R. FinleyResearcher
    Cheap and voluminous capture abilities have no doubt changed how we experience events. But I think we're in a temporary phase of history here. Cameras requiring manual control (and thus our attention) will be replaced by devices that can function automatically, putting us back close in touch with direct experience. But will we go back to using memory the same way we did before everyone had digital cameras?
    Feb 27, 2014

About This Project

We humans have always used our surroundings to extend our memory. But is the technology of today enhancing human memory, or replacing it? We plan to gather survey data and run internet-based psychology experiments to find out:
How are people currently using technology for memory purposes?
How well do people understand the technology and their reliance on it?
Are there ways to improve the interplay between technology and human memory?
Blast off!

Browse Other Projects on Experiment

Related Projects

Opening your mind’s eye: collaborating with a computer to reveal visual imagination

Close your eyes and visualize the streets of your childhood. What do you remember of what you have seen...

Engineering carbonation catalysts for scalable carbon removal within our built environment

Concrete, produced at 40 gigatons annually, can naturally soak up CO2 to form a scalable, durable and verifiable...

The DNA Typewriter: Building a modular system to encode text in DNA

By 2040, we will exhaust the materials needed to store digital data; creating a desperate need to find novel...

Backer Badge Funded

A computer science project funded by 55 people

Add a comment