Simon Finster

Simon Finster

Nov 24, 2021

Group 6 Copy 823
1

Peer effects and sharing behaviour

When individuals interact in social settings and observe decisions by their peers, they are motivated to maintain a positive self-image and converge to a consensus. This is true also in the context of sharing behaviour and charitable giving. In our updated design, we take potential peer effects into account. Under an altruistic narrative, we might expect subjects to share more if they fall behind their peers' sharing behaviour because of perceived social pressure. Similar effects have been demonstrated in the literature in the presence of social pressure, or conditional cooperation (DellaVigna et al., 2012 and Wiepking and Heijnen, 2011) and in the presence of social comparison (Partika, 2017). Under a self-interested narrative, we might expect similar behaviour for a different reason: a greater group confidence in the benefits of sharing suggest that an individual should align their beliefs and sharing decision with that of the group. More details are in our updated pre-analysis plan.

1 comments

Join the conversation!Sign In
  • Rita Asta
    Rita Asta
    Great information
    Dec 23, 2021

About This Project

1 in 4 people have received a COVID-19 vaccine in high-income countries, but only 1 in 500 have in low-income countries (April 2021). A global strategy is needed to save lives, prevent mutations, and kickstart economic recovery.

But how willing are people in resource-rich countries to share? What makes them donate towards vaccines in times of adversity?

We study human behaviour at the confluence of altruism and self-interest to develop guidance for the design of a global vaccine strategy.

Backer Badge Funded

An economics project funded by 47 people

Add a comment